« World AIDS Day: Homage to Still Life by Carlos Almaraz | Eye Level Home | New Acquisition: Welcoming Carmen Herrera, American Artist »
Behind the Scenes: Determining an Artwork's Provenance
December 6, 2011
Sarah Gowen, American Art's Paintings Conservation Intern, gives us a behind the scenes look at how we solved a painting mystery.
In 2006, the Smithsonian American Art Museum acquired The Wiley Family, a group portrait painted by William Williams in 1771. The painting is said to have been handed down through the Wiley family by the son depicted in the portrait. Recently, a privately owned copy of the painting was brought to the Lunder Conservation Center for examination and comparison to the original. It was thought that Williams himself was commissioned at a later date to paint the copy for another member of the Wiley family. Several outside scholars and American Art curators met with conservators at Lunder to discuss the two paintings.
An infrared camera and monitor reveal the underdrawing of the copy by F.W. Wright.
Examination of the copy revealed the inscription "PAINTED BY F.W. Wright AFTER WM WILLIAMS 1771" on the reverse of the canvas. Frederick William Wright (born in 1880) was an American portrait painter active in New York. When his painting was placed next to the original, the experts were able to distinguish subtle stylistic differences between the paintings. Based on this new information, the planned discussion about why Williams would have created the copy shifted to a conversation about why Wright copied the painting over one hundred years after the original was made and how he was able to paint such an accurate reproduction.
Art historians and curators discuss the original painting by William Williams.
To further examine both group portraits, paintings conservators used infrared reflectography (IRR) to investigate possible underdrawings beneath the paint. IRR allows conservators to "see through" paint and look for hidden images or compositional changes. The original painting by Williams does not have an underdrawing visible in infrared; however, IRR revealed that Wright's copy does, and it showed us how he created his painting! A well-defined drawing as well as the remains of a grid and numbering system can be seen using IRR. These markings indicate that Wright used grid measurements to replicate the image to near perfect scale. He then painted the picture, likely while looking at the original painting, to create his accurate copy.
Although we don't know why Wright painted the copy, this process shows the benefits of comparing artworks side by side and using IRR to see drawings beneath the paint. The artistic nuances between the two paintings and the different methods used by Wright and Williams confirmed the information in Wright's inscription—that the second painting was not by Williams.
We have posted additional photographs on Facebook taken during the examination of these paintings.Posted by Jeff on December 6, 2011 in American Art Here, Behind the Scenes
Comments
Awesome story. I love seeing how technology gets applied to art. Thanks!
Posted by: Greg | Dec 7, 2011
Wonderful article. I love finding hidden tidbits in art, makes life all the more exciting!
Posted by: Madeline | Dec 12, 2011
A fascinating story! Wonderful technical sleuthing.
Given my middle name I'd love to know more about the portrait subjects, patrons for the paintings and if it might be part of a related Wiley family.
Posted by: Ellen Wiley Todd | Dec 14, 2011
My family had a painting by the french painter Maurice Dubonnet. It hung above a fireplace that we never used. Eventually, my father wanted to sell it. It took several years to get it authenticated so that we could sell it at a fair price. I don't know what methods were used as I was a child. But i know it was a long and tedious procedure and the outcome was always a little in doubt, no matter how sure we were of its authenticity.
Posted by: Les Wollam | Dec 27, 2011
The comments to this entry are closed.


Recent Comments